Amulet of Spell Protection

Somente dúvidas e exclarecimentos baseados em regra (ou o mais proximo disso) sobre cartas de Itens Mágicos

Moderators: LUCAL, aberway

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby mr_diaz » Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:55 pm

MODERAÇÃO:
Os posts sobre a natureza da ação do Amulet of Spell Protection foram removidos para este tópico.
Favor prosseguir a discussão apenas neste local.
Vitor Dutra
Moderador do Fórum BSW
vitor.dutra02@gmail.com

Vitor Dutra
Forum BSW Moderator
vitor.dutra02@gmail.com
User avatar
mr_diaz
Avatar
Avatar
 
Posts: 2078
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 8:39 am

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby Rikus » Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:07 pm

Senhores,

por favor postem a referência, fica bem mais fácil ajudar a chegar em um consenso. Fico no aguardo.


Atenciosamente,

Rikus
Q se dane!
Rikus
Mago
Mago
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:59 pm
Location: Uberlândia - MG

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby TonyDeath » Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:35 pm

Rikus wrote:Senhores,

por favor postem a referência, fica bem mais fácil ajudar a chegar em um consenso. Fico no aguardo.


Atenciosamente,

Rikus


Tá na página 1. Apesar de eu não concordar... fico com o guide. Porém.. sendo assim ele não cancela quem usa a star gem do eswcorpião! \0/
Image
User avatar
TonyDeath
Psiônico
Psiônico
 
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:48 pm
Location: Campinas

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby Literate » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:11 pm

Amulet of Spell Protection
The attached champion is immune to offensive spells. If this item is in the
pool when a spell is cast, the amulet can be discarded to prevent the effects of
the spell. (Def)

This magical item is wonderful against an opponent who uses a lot of spells. This defensive magical item adds a level bonus of +5 to the attached champion. It would be difficult to think of a better magical item.
A champion with this magical item is immune to offensive spells. So attach it to the most valuable champion in your pool.
Once attached to a champion, this item may be discarded to cancel any spell cast by any player. This item is especially handy if a player does not have access to spells such as Dispel Magic (346/358/3rd) or Spell Turning (398/3rd), allowing you to cancel one of the more deadly spells coming your way.
The Amulet is an excellent candidate for the Staffof Mimicry (61/KU, which would give a player a second copy of this item. This magical item is a must for any deck with- out spellcasters. general. SFRG 2 pág. 245


Star Gem of Martek: Clear Crystal
Spells cast by the attached champion cannot be dispelled. If all five Star
Gems are joined, the attached champion can choose to win any battle,
automatically razing the realm. If this power is used, the Star Gems are
discarded. (Def)

This magical item is one of five Star Gems, and when some or all are brought together they gain additional special power.
This Star Gem is an excellent choice for any SPELLFiRE deck containing spellcasting champions. Any spell cast by the attached champion cannot be dispelled. This includes the use of Dispel Magic (346/358/3rd) and Genie Bottle (436/3rd), but not the effects of the Amulet of Spell Protection (AR Chase/17). This doesn't allow a champion to cast spells when they normally cannot, like under Nullification (35/PO).
If all five of the Star Gems are joined together, the champion can win any one battle and automatically raze the realm. If this special power is used, discard all five of Ihe attached Star Gems. Since this special power is defensive, realms and champions immune to offensive magical items are not exempt from this
effect.


Aqui a pergunta é simples: Qual regra vale? Vale a regra do próprio Amuleto ou a regra de uma outra carta que cita o Amuleto?
Last edited by Literate on Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Literate
Mago
Mago
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:35 pm

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby Rikus » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:16 pm

Eu diria que o texto da 'Amulet', a não ser que tivesse escrito na 'Star Gem': 'Spells cast by the attached champion cannot be dispelled by ANY CARD'. O 'any' sempre ganha na questão de quebra de regra...


Atenciosamente,

Rikus
Last edited by Rikus on Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Q se dane!
Rikus
Mago
Mago
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:59 pm
Location: Uberlândia - MG

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby LUCAL » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:16 pm

foi a mesma pergunta q eu fiz e me ignoraram
Presidente da Liga BSW de Spellfire
Campeão Nacional 2006
e-mail: luizclaudiomelo@gmail.com / Skype: lucalbsw

Tenha seu negócio online com o investimento de apenas R$ 10,00
http://www.fidenetwork.com.br/site/opor ... resentacao
User avatar
LUCAL
Administrador
Administrador
 
Posts: 3231
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:01 pm
Location: Vitória-ES

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby Literate » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:24 pm

foi a mesma pergunta q eu fiz e me ignoraram


Mas qual seria o motivo????
Literate
Mago
Mago
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:35 pm

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby Rikus » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:29 pm

Este eu sei, cada um quer puxar a regra onde mais convém... Acertei tio Literate?
Q se dane!
Rikus
Mago
Mago
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:59 pm
Location: Uberlândia - MG

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby LUCAL » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:35 pm

Literate wrote:
foi a mesma pergunta q eu fiz e me ignoraram


Mas qual seria o motivo????


Eu sou um kra muito cabeça dura quando a coisa está na regra e querem mudar, pra me convencer do contrário tem q gastar realmente tempo, ai acredito que simplesmente desistem ou no caso ignoram afinal é mais fácil
Presidente da Liga BSW de Spellfire
Campeão Nacional 2006
e-mail: luizclaudiomelo@gmail.com / Skype: lucalbsw

Tenha seu negócio online com o investimento de apenas R$ 10,00
http://www.fidenetwork.com.br/site/opor ... resentacao
User avatar
LUCAL
Administrador
Administrador
 
Posts: 3231
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:01 pm
Location: Vitória-ES

Re: Amulet of Spell Protection

Postby Rikus » Tue Oct 23, 2012 4:37 pm

Eu ainda acho que minha resposta é mais adequada, ainda mais vendo o que aconteceu na outra discussão...
Q se dane!
Rikus
Mago
Mago
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:59 pm
Location: Uberlândia - MG

PreviousNext

Return to Itens Mágicos [Magical Itens]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron